IPMA Educates · educator submissions
Present With IPMA
The IPMA presenter pathway gives master trainers a transparent process for proposing rigorous workshops, lectures, and professional-learning experiences.
Applicants submit a technical application with curriculum vitae, workshop syllabus, learning outcomes, disclosure statement, references where relevant, and requested Continuing Education Credit weight. Incomplete submissions are returned with a clear request for missing evidence.
Peer review considers originality, practical relevance, evidence literacy, participant safety, inclusion, timing, and the educator’s capability to deliver the stated learning outcomes. Commercial material must be transparent and cannot dominate the educational purpose.
Submission windows and programme deadlines are published for each annual cycle. Accepted educators retain responsibility for accurate claims, accessible materials, and timely delivery of participant resources and post-session evaluation data.
| Review stage | Decision basis |
|---|---|
| Initial screen | Complete documents and declared conflicts |
| Peer review | Learning value, safety, and originality |
| Programme approval | Capacity, schedule, and CEC allocation |